If you are a Python user, and you do Numerical Analysis, it might be time to move from Numerical Python to SciPy Core. I complained earlier about SciPy Core, but it seems that most of the problems I pointed out (missing inline documentation and broken functions) have either been fixed, or I wrongly pointed a finger.

I still have a few issues with the new package though:

  • The naming convention for the LinearAlgebra package is awful. I don’t want to have to work with a package called “scipy.basic.linalg”: if you want to save space, don’t abbreviate LinearAlgebra to linalg and add three subpackages to it. Call the package scipy.LinearAlgebra, for example.
  • There are glitches in the documentation. Both “help(scipy.basic.linalg)” or “help(scipy.linalg)” return a page describing “scipy.basic.linalg” as the “Lite version of scipy.linalg” and a list of 3 supported functions (Heigenvectors, eigenvectors, singular_value_decomposition). There are more than only 3 functions in this package!

On the positive side of things, you can now simply do “import scipy” to get the basic functions (like the scipy.array class). So, time to switch!

No Comments »

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Warning: When entering a long comment, please ensure that you make copy of your text prior to submitting it. If the server should fail or if you hit a bug, you might lose your work. I am not responsible for your lost effort.

To spammers: I carefully review every single post and make sure that spam gets deleted. You are wasting your time if you are manually entering spam using this form. Read my terms of use to see what I consider to be abusive.

Example: duo plus septem is '9'. The numbers are expressed in latin numerals but you should give your answers using ordinary digits.

 

« Blog's main page

Powered by WordPress