<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Efficient FIFO/Queue data structure in Python</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2006/08/21/efficient-fifoqueue-data-structure-in-python/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2006/08/21/efficient-fifoqueue-data-structure-in-python/</link>
	<description>Computer Scientist and Open Scholar: Databases, Information Retrieval, Business Intelligence.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:13:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: b</title>
		<link>http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2006/08/21/efficient-fifoqueue-data-structure-in-python/comment-page-1/#comment-28535</link>
		<dc:creator>b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 12:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/?p=749#comment-28535</guid>
		<description>I reran the tests with this code and differencese are indeed massive:

&gt;&gt;&gt; execfile(&#039;de2.py&#039;)
&quot;&quot;
0.911000013351
&quot;&quot;
0.790999889374
&quot;&quot;
2.06299996376

Increasing iterations of each loop 10 times:

&gt;&gt;&gt; execfile(&#039;de2.py&#039;)
&quot;&quot;
8.94199991226
&quot;&quot;
8.04200005531
&quot;&quot;
136.887000084</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reran the tests with this code and differencese are indeed massive:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; execfile(&#8216;de2.py&#8217;)<br />
&#8220;&#8221;<br />
0.911000013351<br />
&#8220;&#8221;<br />
0.790999889374<br />
&#8220;&#8221;<br />
2.06299996376</p>
<p>Increasing iterations of each loop 10 times:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; execfile(&#8216;de2.py&#8217;)<br />
&#8220;&#8221;<br />
8.94199991226<br />
&#8220;&#8221;<br />
8.04200005531<br />
&#8220;&#8221;<br />
136.887000084</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b</title>
		<link>http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2006/08/21/efficient-fifoqueue-data-structure-in-python/comment-page-1/#comment-28314</link>
		<dc:creator>b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 14:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/?p=749#comment-28314</guid>
		<description>Weird, I got the following numbers:

&gt;&gt;&gt; execfile(&#039;de.py&#039;)

8.79299998283

7.91100001335

9.47399997711

Lists are worse but not that much worse. They might have improved performance of lists, I&#039;m running 2.4.3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird, I got the following numbers:</p>
<p>&gt;&gt;&gt; execfile(&#8216;de.py&#8217;)</p>
<p>8.79299998283</p>
<p>7.91100001335</p>
<p>9.47399997711</p>
<p>Lists are worse but not that much worse. They might have improved performance of lists, I&#8217;m running 2.4.3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

