Peter Turney tells us that there is almost no instance of a great discovery or invention that was not discovered independently and simultaneously. I think it is very important to keep this in mind, given our culture of overinflated egos.

Peter then asks a very important question. If his theory is true, and he has strong backing, then why is this fact getting so little recognition?

No Comments »

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Warning: When entering a long comment, please ensure that you make copy of your text prior to submitting it. If the server should fail or if you hit a bug, you might lose your work. I am not responsible for your lost effort.

To spammers: I carefully review every single post and make sure that spam gets deleted. You are wasting your time if you are manually entering spam using this form. Read my terms of use to see what I consider to be abusive.

Example: duo plus septem is '9'. The numbers are expressed in latin numerals but you should give your answers using ordinary digits.

 

« « Previous: Turing award recipient tears apart artificial intelligence
Next: Color terminal under Mac OS X » »

« Blog's main page

Powered by WordPress

© 2004-2012, (lemire at gmail dot com). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.