<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My research process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2007/11/19/my-research-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2007/11/19/my-research-process/</link>
	<description>Computer Scientist and Open Scholar: Databases, Information Retrieval, Business Intelligence.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:39:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zhuo wang</title>
		<link>http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2007/11/19/my-research-process/comment-page-1/#comment-50873</link>
		<dc:creator>zhuo wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2007/11/19/my-research-process/#comment-50873</guid>
		<description>Total agree with you. Almost Same here. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total agree with you. Almost Same here. <img src='http://lemire.me/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Turney</title>
		<link>http://lemire.me/blog/archives/2007/11/19/my-research-process/comment-page-1/#comment-49556</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Turney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daniel-lemire.com/blog/archives/2007/11/19/my-research-process/#comment-49556</guid>
		<description>I agree with almost everything you say here, except one thing: &quot;Almost invariably, the nicest problems take one of the following forms: 1) I want to explain theoretically something I observe experimentally 2) I want to improve on an existing method by at least an order of magnitude (in accuracy, simplicity, speed).&quot; To me, the nicest problem is a new task that (almost) nobody has tried before. For example, can I automatically extract keyphrases from a document? Can I automatically determine whether a review (e.g., a movie review, a book review, a car review) is positive or negative? Can I automatically answer multiple-choice SAT analogy questions? This is neither (1) nor (2). In a way, you almost can&#039;t fail, because even the tiniest bit of success on a brand new task is an improvement on the state of the art, because there is no state of the art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with almost everything you say here, except one thing: &#8220;Almost invariably, the nicest problems take one of the following forms: 1) I want to explain theoretically something I observe experimentally 2) I want to improve on an existing method by at least an order of magnitude (in accuracy, simplicity, speed).&#8221; To me, the nicest problem is a new task that (almost) nobody has tried before. For example, can I automatically extract keyphrases from a document? Can I automatically determine whether a review (e.g., a movie review, a book review, a car review) is positive or negative? Can I automatically answer multiple-choice SAT analogy questions? This is neither (1) nor (2). In a way, you almost can&#8217;t fail, because even the tiniest bit of success on a brand new task is an improvement on the state of the art, because there is no state of the art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

