Why tenure matters?

Since the end of World War II, at least half of all university professors in North America have tenure: they cannot be dismissed without adequate cause. This job security is earned: you need to be a professor for several years, and to perform well, before you can be granted tenure.

At several schools, a large fraction of the teaching positions do not lead to tenure. There are claims that there is a growing trend to hire more and more people people on temporary positions. One justification for this trend might be that universities need the flexibility to adapt quickly to the market.

The same might be true of research institutions. While I worked at NRC, several projects were staffed by people whose contracts was for the duration of a project.

One argument that I hear to justify tenure is that it saves money. Indeed, people will accept a lower salary if they have job security. Even if the job market is favorable, even if if you could get more money elsewhere, few people like to change job frequently. Stability is nice.

But this argument is limited. What if the job market is difficult? If there is an oversupply of Ph.D.s, shouldn’t managers do away with tenure then?

Maybe not. Bland et al. have shown that tenure matters. According to their study, tenure-track professors perform significantly better than others:

faculty on tenure appointments are significantly more productive in research, more productive in education, more committed to their positions, (…)

Published by

Daniel Lemire

A computer science professor at the University of Quebec (TELUQ).

7 thoughts on “Why tenure matters?”

  1. By the way, Israel’s universities are on strike for the last 50 days on issues related to a government reform in academic education, and also on a change in tenure procedures.

  2. I find it hard to believe that tenure changes people to being more productive.

    Yet, this is what the authors write:

    (…) a non-tenure system may well be less conducive to commitment and productivity

  3. This study seems to show that the tenure selection process works. The best people are selected. I find it hard to believe that tenure changes people to being more productive.

  4. Ah, which is cause and which is effect? Are the best people tenured, or is tenure conducive to productivity?

    I suggest the latter. Most people who are non-tenure-track are hired that way, rather than being relegated to that after trying and failing to get tenure. The selection process that leads away from the tenure track often has little to do with productivity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To create code blocks or other preformatted text, indent by four spaces:

    This will be displayed in a monospaced font. The first four 
    spaces will be stripped off, but all other whitespace
    will be preserved.
    Markdown is turned off in code blocks:
     [This is not a link](http://example.com)

To create not a block, but an inline code span, use backticks:

Here is some inline `code`.

For more help see http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax