Do you share and index your history?

When you edit a document, some software will generate automatically a new version of the document and allow you to see what changed. If the software is sufficiently smart, you might even know when and by whom the change was made. Wikipedia is good at keeping traces of everything. Email and blogs leave traces. Videoconferencing does not usually leave traces: you cannot replay a Skype conference after it has concluded.

However, beyond keeping traces, software can share and index traces. Each email is a trace of a conversation, and it can be retrieved later, but your emails are not shared. Word processors allow you to send a document with recorded changes, but you cannot easily refer to a specific change in the document.

In any case, I made the following table:

MediumKeep historyShare historyIndex history
Word ProcessingSometimesManuallyNo
EmailYesManuallyYes
Phone, Videoconferencing (Skype), face-to-faceNoNoNo
Facebook, TwitterYesYesNo
BlogYesYesYes

Credit: This idea came after a discussion with Sébastien Paquet.

2 thoughts on “Do you share and index your history?”

  1. That’s why it is necessary to use version control for the scientific projects. I discovered that I can use svn + trac for keeping latex and matlab files and for me it is a big step forward. Now I can track changes in articles and matlab code. I do not share it, but it is already pays off. I will try to blog about this experience.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To create code blocks or other preformatted text, indent by four spaces:

    This will be displayed in a monospaced font. The first four 
    spaces will be stripped off, but all other whitespace
    will be preserved.
    
    Markdown is turned off in code blocks:
     [This is not a link](http://example.com)

To create not a block, but an inline code span, use backticks:

Here is some inline `code`.

For more help see http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax