Science and Technology links (June 22nd 2019)

    1. An implemented chip can improve long-term memory. It is currently impractical, but a start-up company will try to bring this technology to market.
    2. Never before so many simultaneous and distinct new approaches have been in development in the history of drug research.
    3. Once more, we have evidence that exercise can rejuvenate your muscles.
    4. After controlling for sun exposure and other factors, sunscreen neither causes nor prevents skin cancers. Sun exposure itself is associated with fewer cancers and better cardiovascular health. Of course, increased sun exposure is also associated with an increased rate of skin cancers. Yet the association is relatively modest, e.g., living all day under the sun probably does not double your risk of skin cancers (while it has other strong benefits). Note that there are other benefits to sunscreen than cancer prevention.
    5. Fast food is most popular among the upper-middle income brackets.

Published by

Daniel Lemire

A computer science professor at the University of Quebec (TELUQ).

2 thoughts on “Science and Technology links (June 22nd 2019)”

  1. The sunscreen result is odd but interesting. Here’s another article that argues, convincingly, I thought, that there’s so many confounding variables that the meta-analysis is very hard to do well.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30447006

    They also note that the only randomized controlled study did find a strong positive effect.

    It does seem to me that this meta-analysis would be hard to do well. Self-reported use of sunscreen, that sunscreen is used more heavily by people at risk of skin cancer, and that sunscreen is used inconsistently in areas with heavy sun exposure all seem problematic to doing a good analysis in anything but a randomized controlled trial.

    1. Nice link.

      Aside from trying to determine a causal effect, there are some things that we do know.

      1. Studies on people who work all day outside without sunscreen, in the sun, shows that they do have more skin cancers… However, the risk factor is always less than 2.

      2. This means that “cancer causing” effect of the sun is relatively small (*)… and because it is relatively small, it means that you are likely to have trouble measuring the effect.

      3. If you do not see why a risk factor less than 2 is ‘small’, consider that your risk of cancer doubles every 8 years or so, just due to aging. And, more importantly, skin cancer is not what kills most people. You want to look at all-cause mortality rates. And that’s where it becomes interesting because sun exposure seems to have all sorts of benefits. That is, you should be eager to trade a 40% increase risk of skin cancer if it comes with a 10% reduction in heart diseases (and that seems to be the kind of numbers we are talking about) because you will lower you all-cause mortality rate.

      4. Full disclosure: I always wear suncreen and will continue to do so.

      *- It is possible that people who work all day long in the sun do not have maximal risk… e.g., office workers who occasionally go in the sun without protection could actually be worse off… but will they be 2x more likely to have cancer than people working outside all the time? Basically, the most reasonable

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To create code blocks or other preformatted text, indent by four spaces:

    This will be displayed in a monospaced font. The first four 
    spaces will be stripped off, but all other whitespace
    will be preserved.
    
    Markdown is turned off in code blocks:
     [This is not a link](http://example.com)

To create not a block, but an inline code span, use backticks:

Here is some inline `code`.

For more help see http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax